Keep each contribution visible
Give artists, editors, journalists, producers and engineers their own roles and contribution histories. Review a shared project without merging everyone into an anonymous activity total.
StudiosProduction teamsCollaborators
For studios and production teams
DELIVER A CLEAR RECORD OF YOUR TEAM’S WORK.
Apply a strict human creation standard to the work your team delivers. DigiBridge brings recorded contributions, layered detection and a dedicated AI verification agent together, so project leads can review prohibited assistance and resolve issues before client delivery.
Human creation verification
Studios and Creative Teams
Keep contributions, creative evidence and publishing decisions clear across your team.
The problem
A HANDOFF SHOULD NOT LOSE THE HISTORY.
A project moves from writer to producer, editor to colourist, sound team to broadcaster, and studio to client. Keep contributions, declarations and version review together so a handoff retains its context without exposing confidential source material.
What DigiBridge does
TURN YOUR CREATIVE PROCESS INTO USEFUL EVIDENCE.
Apply one publishing standard
Layered checks and your dedicated AI verification agent look for prohibited AI assistance and software generated control replacing a contributor. The supporting evidence and each person’s context stay available for review alongside the finding.
Protect client confidence and source material
Share the evidence selected for a specific deliverable, with access appropriate to the recipient. Keep confidential creative files and unrelated workspace records private.
How it works
FROM YOUR WORKFLOW TO A CLEARER REVIEW.
- 1
Set up the team and project
Create the workspace, assign project admins and invite individual contributors. Agree who can record, review and publish for each client project.
- 2
Record each person’s work
Contributors choose the project and available recording connection. Live warnings bring suspected prohibited control to their attention, while the project record keeps individual contributions, gaps and findings available for authorised review.
- 3
Deliver a reviewed version
Check the contributions and assistance declarations, resolve holds and select the evidence appropriate for the client. Send a link for the exact version being delivered.
One production lifecycle
KEEP SOUND AND PICTURE CONNECTED.
Bring music and media teams into a common project and version review. Choose an available connection for the work being recorded; keep handoffs, roles and permissions explicit.
Workflow portfolio
Premiere Pro
After Effects
DaVinci Resolve
Ableton Live
Pro Tools
FL Studio
Across the lifecycle
- Individual contributions
- Client review
- Version delivery
Explore the tool portfolio. Your Mac setup guide shows the connections available for your workflow.
An example from your workflow
ONE DELIVERY. A CLEAR TEAM RECORD.
For a television campaign, the project admin can review picture, music, sound and graphics contributions before sharing the permitted record with the client.
Share selected evidence for the version under review. Your creative source files and typed content stay private.
Project evidence
Review before publicationTelevision campaign: client delivery
Delivery v2
- Project responsibility
- Studio admin manages publication
- Individual contributions
- Editor · composer · sound engineer · motion designer
- Review required
- Motion designer’s declaration pending
- Client access
- Selected version and evidence only
Registration connects the project to its history. The version’s verification status is shown separately.
A standard with follow through
CLEAR RULES PROTECT THE VALUE OF THE RECORD.
The strict programme excludes prohibited AI assistance and software generated control acting in place of the contributor. Layered checks and your dedicated AI verification agent examine permitted activity, support detection and connect findings to evidence. You can add context and challenge a finding; confirmed incidents follow the publishing rules below.
Act on a warning
Warnings identify the issue and its evidence. The first confirmed incident holds the affected recording or version from programme publication, with a route to review.
Keep the standard meaningful
Three distinct confirmed incidents disqualify the project from directory publication. Attributable private account marks and reviewed action address repeated abuse.
Keep review fair
Explain your workflow and challenge the evidence if it is wrong. A recording gap or an AI suspicion alone does not count as a confirmed incident.
Why this matters now
CLEAR CONTRIBUTIONS. CONSISTENT DELIVERY.
Studios need useful records at handoff and a clear standard at release. Capture the details with the team, while the work is still in progress.
Context 0114 APR 2026
20%
LACKED WRITER INFORMATION
The UK Intellectual Property Office reported that 20% of recordings with usage in the participating DSP data lacked writer information.
Scope: PARTICIPATING DSP DATA
Why it matters: Five DSPs contributed quantitative data. Capturing contribution details during creation gives teams information to review before delivery.
UK Intellectual Property OfficeContext 02SPECIFICATION 2.2
Origin
MEDIA HISTORY HAS A STANDARD
C2PA defines a way to attach signed information about the origin and history of digital media. Its model makes the source of a claim visible.
Scope: CONTENT PROVENANCE
Why it matters: DigiBridge focuses on the creative process, people and publishing decision behind a submitted version.
C2PA explainerContext 03PUBLISHING POLICY
3
CONFIRMED INCIDENTS DISQUALIFY A PROJECT
The first confirmed incident of prohibited AI assistance or synthetic control holds the affected recording or version from publication. Three distinct confirmed incidents make the project ineligible for the public directory.
Scope: DIGIBRIDGE PROJECTS
Why it matters: Findings can be reviewed and challenged. A recording gap or an AI suggestion alone does not count as a confirmed incident.
DigiBridge standardFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Who is responsible for a shared project?
Workspace and project roles control who can manage contributors, review evidence and publish. Recorded contributions remain linked to the individual account, so responsibility stays clear across the team.
What happens when a contributor receives a finding?
Review the evidence and the contributor’s context; an AI suggestion or recording gap alone is not a confirmed incident. The first confirmed incident holds the affected recording or version from publication, and three distinct confirmed incidents make the project ineligible for the public directory. Findings can be challenged, and any account consequences are attributed through review.
Can we use DigiBridge for confidential client work?
Source creative files and typed content stay outside evidence collection. Keep project evidence private and share only the permitted record appropriate to your client and agreement.
Start your DigiBridge record
MAKE YOUR CREATIVE STANDARD PART OF EVERY DELIVERY.
Discuss your team structure, client handoffs and recording workflow with DigiBridge.